
In
the continuation of the bankside forum, Peter Springate, Jim Gibbinson, Nick Buss, John
Carver and Brian Mills discuss carp fishing past and present.Click here if you missed part three. Image Courtesy Of The Freshwater Informe |
| Steve | Continuing the theme of tackle development, what about some of the smaller items? Nylon line has certainly improved over the years, but its not fundamentally different from 50 years ago. On the other hand we now have new materials such as the modern braids. How important do you think these are? |
| Nick | Braids have no real place in carp fishing. Dont lift your eyebrows, John! |
| Peter | No, I wouldnt say that. |
| Nick | When it says on the spool "high abrasion resistance" thats only in comparison to other braids. I could show you some pictures of braid damage to carp, and Brian will back me up on this. I dont care what anyone says. |
| Brian | It can cut a carps mouth like cheesewire. |
| Nick | Yes, but that goes back to the old braided hooklengths. |
| Brian | But people still use them. |
| John | Braid is braid. Are you talking about Spectra/Dyneema braids or are you talking about the Kryston HPEE type braids? |
| Nick | Theres a difference between braids as hooklengths and braids as mainlines. I use braid as a reel line for lure fishing all the time. But within carp fishing theres very little use for them. |
| John | I dont use them, but I wouldnt say theres no place for them in carp fishing. |
| Nick | OK for marker floats .. |
| Jim | I disagree entirely. |
| Nick | I knew you would! Ive read the book as well (laughter). |
| Brian | Multistrand is far less damaging to the fish. |
| Steve | I know Jim has done a lot of field testing of braids. |
| Jim | Yes, I have, but the field tests are still going on so I wont talk about those for the minute. But the hook length braids I think are tremendous products. I dont agree that theyre any more damaging than mono is. We can only gauge it from our own personal experiences. Theres a lot of anecdotal experience, a lot of anecdotes shall we say, but Ive caught innumerable carp on braid, and if I were cheesewiring their mouths believe me I wouldnt use it! Its as simple as that, and Im not! |
![]() Click Here For Secure Online Shopping |
|
| Brian | Have you tried Spiderwire? |
| Jim | No, Ive never used Spiderwire. Ive use HPEE and Ive used Dyneema as in Snakebite, the core that is of Snakebite. I mean low diameter line, whether it be braid or mono, has the potential to cause damage when its under tension. Of course it does. But I dont agree that braid is more inherently damaging than mono in that regard. I really do not. |
| Brian | I cant really agree with that. When braid became fashionable, on one of the waters I fish, initially an angler was using a fine braid, one of the high strength ones. He was doing very well and everyone went onto braid. Not the high strength ones, but stuff like, well you name it, Hutchinson for example that was the main one in use. Now, within weeks of that we had carp with split mouths. In fairness to Jim, we did have some carp with split mouths prior to that, but it certainly increased, and sadly its continued to do so. Prior to that perhaps 20% of the fish had damaged mouths, now its more like 50%. |
| Nick | I wasnt referring to braids as hooklengths, but rather as mainlines. |
| John | Thats very different. |
| Jim | Yes, entirely different. |
| Nick | If you look at here at Wingham, weve had one angler on here who uses braided mainlines. |
| John | Did. |
| Nick | Apart from the inordinate number of times his line broke, if you look through these pictures in the Catch Book, every fish he caught has got scales lifted on them, abrasions on the sides |
| John | |
| Jim | I think what caused a lot of mouth damage was that we had a fashion that coincided with braid, for up-eyed hooks. The "hair" was tied as a continuation of the hooklink, and the up-eyed hook made this all nice and neat. But the up-eyed hook, by its nature, tends to catch on the side of the mouth, where a carp has the most delicate tissue. If that happens continually, youve got ripping, erosion and so on. The best place to hook them is in the lower lip. |
| John | Do you also think, Jim, that the damage to the fishs
mouth also coincided with the time that much heavier leads started to be used. Longer
casting came in without shock leaders, and the number of crack-offs was enormous. Im
convinced that a lot of fish went around picking up those baits, and they actually ripped
themselves free. Ive actually seen them do it snags. One thing people always say is that quite often when a fish is hooked and lost it goes and rests up in snags. Im sure that in lots of cases where they were actually trailing hook links theyd get tangled up and eventually, when theyd sorted themselves out and got over the stress, theyd literally rip themselves free. Im sure more mouth damage was done in this way, and of course it did also coincide with probably, larger, stronger hooks. |
| Nick | This damage also occurred though on smaller waters as well as large ones, where crack-offs werent the norm. |
| John | Well, you take Sutton. Suttons a small water. There was a spate of braid being used there, but not for long. Most of the mouths of the Sutton fish, theres no problem with them. |
| Peter | Have you ever come across barbel with mouth damage? |
| John | Ive come across chub, lots of chub with mouth damage. |
| Peter | I use braid for chub and barbel all the time. I must say Ive never had any problems whatsoever. |
Makers Of Fishing Rods Of The Highest Quality Click Here For A FREE Brochure |
|
| Steve | As mainline or hooklengths? |
| Peter | All the way through. |
| John | The scaling is different though. Take the big scales on mirrors for example. |
| Jim | I dont find it difficult to believe that braid running all the away along a fish can strip scales. But I find it difficult to believe the same thing wouldnt happen with mono. I mean, Ive cut myself on mono, when Im testing a knot or something as easily as I have with braid. |
| Nick | The braid tends to be finer. |
| Peter | I remember knocking a few scales off fish years ago when using mono. Using braid for carp, which I no longer do, I never had any problems with it. |
| Nick | Ive always been apprehensive having seen the pictures in this book for instance . |
| Peter | But youve got no proof that braid was to blame. |
| Nick | He was the only angler on here whos ever used braid. In his pictures, the fish have all got scales knocked off. |
| John | To me, of more concern when using braid, is that when you knot it, youve lost a third of its breaking strain. Theres no impact strength in the stuff a sudden jerk will snap it. Also if it does snap, it doesnt rot. It just stays the same forever. |
| Nick | Good, Im glad youre concerned cos it was you who was raising your eyebrows earlier! |
![]() The Premier UK Angling Site on the Internet www.specialist-tackle.co.uk |
|
| John | That was because I thought you were referring to braid hooklinks, which I cant see the problem with. |
| Nick | With hooklinks, if you use a set-up similar to Jims line aligners, in all probability youll have a piece of tube round the side of the fishs mouth, and no damage can be caused. |
| Jim | I think with 9 out of 10 carp, its academic what the hooklink consists of as its outside the mouth anyway. |
| Nick | Yeah, modern rigs dictate that you do hook the fish in the
bottom lip. Brian catches most of his fish float fishing, and hes had horrible things happen with braid. You just wont use them will you Brian? |
| Brian | No. Most of the fishing I do is very, very close range. Quite apart from the possible mouth damage, at such close range braids lack of stretch and impact resistance results in too many lost fish. |
| Steve | Well, it seems that everyones agreed that they wouldnt use braid all the way through for carp fishing but opinions seem divided on hooklengths. |
In the next instalment of the Carp Forum, our panel of experts starts off on the subject of hooks. |
|